A Report On Walmart Bribery Scandal In Mexico

Introduction

The operation business development is seriously unique and testing like never before because of the enormous progression in the innovation and technology. Most of the companies are confronting extraordinary challenges to guarantee advanced development and sustainability. Companies always aims to give their better facilities and services to their customers to guarantee the long-term growth development plan and sustainability. Some of the time companies bombs in its business activity regardless of the best endeavours. In most of the cases, the main factor that separates among the different partners of the firm is communication and ethical issue. Walmart, an American multinational company, stands today as the one of the most successful business models in the world. However, in 2005 Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is at the focal point of a media firestorm following allegations that the retail giant silenced an internal bribery examination including the fast extension of its retail stores expansion in Mexico. The investigation of the high ranking representatives have opened how the biggest retailer on the planet has figured out how to actualize and straightforwardly parade with the global standards with their disgraceful practices (LeVine, 2012). This report aims to provide an overview of the ethical issue occurred in the company in Mexico and its effect on their home country through PESTEL analysis. It will then be followed by explaining the organisation culture, its ethical issue which has brought tremendous impact in its businesses.

Overview of Ethical Issue

Walmart Inc (Walmart) is a global retailer that operates grocery stores, supermarkets, hypermarkets, department and discount stores, and neighbourhood markets. The company’s stores offer grocery and consumables, health and wellness, technology, office and entertainment, hardlines, apparel and home categories at everyday low prices. As of January 2019, the company had a total of 4,588 owned and 780 leased retail units in the US and 1,946 company-owned and 4,047 leased retail units internationally. It also operated a total of 179 Walmart US distribution facilities and Sam’s Club distribution facilities. Internationally, Walmart operated, 226 distribution facilities with generating a revenue of US$ 514.4 Billion worldwide as of 2019.

The company operates under the name Walmart in the United States and Canada, as Walmart de México y Centro América in Mexico and Central America, as Asda in the United Kingdom, as the Seiyu Group in Japan, and as Best Price in India. According to the investigation, The New York Times reported the allegations that the former executive of Walmart de Mexico was involved in a bribery scandal in 2005. The incident was occurred by the senior Wal-Mart official.

The incident has shown that, a senior Wal-Mart lawyer got an alarming e-mail from the former executive at the company’s subsidiary Wal-Mart de Mexico. The organization had paid bribes of US$24 Million, by means of via local fixers to authorities all through Mexico in return for development permits, data, and different favours, which gave Walmart a considerable preferred standpoint over competitors. When F.B.I official had investigated into the issues, they found that it was violation activity of Mexico and USA laws enforcement (Barstow, 2012). The organization took care of the case carefully through growing the examination procedure and a report has been discovered that, the organization has closed it down without making the notice to the American and Mexican Law requirement authorities and it additionally demonstrated that the authorities were undisciplined.

It is evident that the effect that Wal-Mart and its associates have endured is unsure. However, organization has endured financial lawsuit, investigation by the Department of Justice and Securities Exchange Commission. if Wal-Mart is discovered guilty of violating the FCPA, they could be in charge of paying roughly $300 million dollars in fines.

PESTEL Analysis of USA and Mexico

A PESTEL analysis or PESTLE investigation is a framework analyse and monitor screen the macro-environmental factors variables that may profoundly affect an organisation’s growth and development. PESTEL stands for Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental and Legal factor. This PESTEL analysis aims to address some of the concerning factors makes a difference in running a business in USA and Mexico.

PESTEL Analysis of United States of America

1. Political. The USA is the second largest democracy in the world. The head of the country is president and is elected for a four-year term. Their election is considered to be transparent and fair. They have a strong political and has a massive influence over the dynamics of politics of many countries around the globe. Due to stable political factor, the country has been the best choice for many multination organisations for investments for countries such as China, India, Brazil, South America and many other. The other strength of USA is being able to fight against terrorist activities emerging from within and outside the country. According to Department of Homeland Security, the attacks has been declined since 1970s. The US has a large-scale free trade agreement known as Trans Pacific Partnership (TTP), with other eleven countries including Japan, Australia, Canada, Mexico, New Zealand and many more.

2. Economic. The US has the most advanced economic framework on the planet with the nation having a solid position in the manufacturing and development sectors. US government was able to reduce its general government defect 12.67% of GDP in 2009 to 4.94% of GDP in 2016 because of fiscal consolidation. According to MarketLine, the country’s real GDP in 2017 stood at $17.3 trillion with a per capita Nitesh Poudyal 12598431 level of $52,969 (at 2010 US$ prices). However, The US Government needs to keep a mind its high broad government debt, which presents huge dangers to the economy in the long term.

3. Social. According to the United Nation’s 2016 Human Development Report, the American population enjoys a high standard of living with the country raking 10th amongst 188 countries around the world. To provide healthcare access to the elderly and less-privileged population, the US Government runs a social insurance schemes such as Medicare and Medicaid. Due to rapidly aging population, the country faces the risks of serious labour shortage, rising tax rates and increasing social security costa over the next few decades. However, around 10 million American have been either unemployed or underemployed.

4. Technology. Innovation and development are key drivers of the US economy. Due to its advancement in technology and innovation, a large portion of manufacturing and services output entails the application of sophisticated technologies such as 3-D printing which has enabled US to maintain its position of leadership in science, technology and innovation.

5. Environmental. The USA has very diverse climate, wildlife and geography which draws million of visitors around the world from country such as Japan, Brazil, China, Mexico being on the top of the list. However, the weather condition is one of the toughest in the world. Being the powerful country in the world, USA needs a more proactive attention on international environment cooperation with a focus of climate protection, biodiversity.

6. Legal. USA ranks as 18th out of 180 nations in the Index of Economic Freedom, who enjoys high levels of labour freedom and financial freedom because it has a sound legal framework and an independent judiciary. US has 38.91% of the corporate tax rate of in 2017, being the highest.

PESTEL Analysis of Mexico

1. Political. Mexico has a robust democratic setup. Lopez Obrador of MORENA won the election by receiving 53% of the vote in the election occurred in 2018, who assumed the presidential office as the 58th president of Mexico. They have broad range of political and social rights, including freedom of expression, right to conduct peaceful protest against authorities. The country is having overburdening government regulation which make it challenging in terms if the productivity of business environment. The direction if foreign policy between US and Mexico remains uncertain, since the election of Donald Trump as US president in 2016.

2. Economic. Mexico became the first Latin American member of the OECD in 1994. Mexico’s trade with US and Canada has almost tripled after implementation of NAFTA in 1994. The economic depends on commercial relations with US and from migrant workers. According to MarketLine, the economy grew an average annual rate of 2.74%. The country is very depended on the US economy.

3. Social. About 26.61% of the Mexican population is under the age of 14 and below, as of 2018. Total health expenditure was 5.72 of GDP. They have the high level if investment, but the education system is failing at various level, however the governments want to improve the quality of education by providing scholarship for college students.

4. Technological. Due to the solid workforce, Mexico has been one of the markets for multinational companies to open manufacturing centres across the country. They have poor investment in science and technology and has a very long way to go in terms of innovation and R&D.

5. Environmental. Mexico City is considered one of the most polluted cities in the world. Criticism from environmental groups has been attracted but to rampant deforestation. The border Environment, signed on August 8, 2012 will focus on way to reduce pollution in the water, air and on land.

6. Legal. Mexico was ranked the 66th freest economy by the Wall Street Journal’s Index of Economic Freedom in 2019. The country is ranked 12th amongst the 32 countries in the Americas region, and its overall score remained higher than the regional and world averages. Mexico positioned 139th out of 140 countries regarding composed violations. The nation additionally positioned inadequately as far as the unwavering quality of its police administrations, just as that of the legal executive .

Similarities and Differences between USA & Mexico

This part of the report will discuss the few similarities and differences between two counties two countries USA and Mexico, with the help of PESTEL analysis explained above. We can learn now how these factor (PESTLE) affects many multination companies for operating their business in different part of the world.

USA being the most powerful and being the second largest democracy country in the world, its standout as the best choice for many big companies to start their start-ups, or for the investment. They have a very strong political influence, strong terrorism combat, which puts USA as the best choice for running a business. Mexico also has strong robust democratic setup, where there are freedom of speech, expression very similar to USA. However, the friendship between the two countries are not that strong which put the business operation between Uncertain over two countries policy.

The Economic factor plays a very vital role for big companies to operate in different part of the world. According to MarketLine 2018, USA has a GDP of $17.3 trillion per capita whereas Mexico has a GDP of $1.15 trillion capita, which is a huge difference between these two countries. This factor implies that the USA has more advantage than Mexico, for allowing big companies to operate in their countries. Mexico is overdependence on the US economy for their development, which can be the future risk for improvement in this sector.

USA population enjoys the high standard of living, which ranks best 10th amongst 188 countries in the world, the US government runs Medicare system, to provide better health care system, however, is experiencing the expensive health care system now. Whereas in Mexico the government is experiencing insufficient fund for the healthcare and resources which effect the quality of health and life in the country. USA has a better education system in comparison to of Mexico. USA main economy drive factors are innovation and development, where 3-D printing has enabled it to earn its leadership position in technology and innovation, whereas Mexico is experiencing a poor investment in science and technology which put them as a second option compared to USA for big companies to operate in their nation.

USA and Mexico both are rich in biodiversity and they both my policy on sustaining the environment, however its not at its best. Mexico is now facing air pollution as one of their challenges. Both countries have plans to work together, for the agreement on the border environment issue which help both of them in running a friendly environment in running companies in both of their counties.

In legal factor USA ranks and 18th, whereas Mexico ranks as 66th freest economy, labour freedom and financial freedom. USA has good judiciary justice system, whereas Mexico is experiencing a poor criminal justice which effect the countries to run within their law of operation which ultimately affects the multination companies to operate in their countries.

Organizational Culture

Organisational culture is defined as the beliefs, values, vision, a relationship between the employee, organisation and their customers. This part of the report will discuss the organisation structure and culture of Wal-Mart, which will give us an insight of how it manages to offer quality products and how it manages to run the one of the biggest multination companies in the world. The culture of an organisation defers from companies to companies.

Walmart has a hierarchical functional organisational structure. It has level structure which helps in having a wide range of control as contrasted and tall structure that have thin range of control. It has solid vertical specialist structure which is centralised when contrasted with those with weak authority structure are decentralised. There are various hierarchical practices that oversee the achievement or disappointment of Wal-Mart, some of them would be correspondence, inspiration and basic leadership. This structure has two features: chain of command (hierarchy) and functional based definition. The chain of importance include relates to the vertical lines of direction and expert all through the hierarchical structure. For instance, aside from the CEO, each representative has an immediate supervisor. Orders and direction originating from the top dimensions of the organization's administration are executed through centre supervisors down to the majority workers in Walmart stores.

The primary impact of Walmart's various hierarchy authoritative structure is the capacity of corporate chiefs to effortlessly impact the whole association. For instance, new policy and methodologies created at the organization's corporate headquarters are straightforwardly passed on to territorial supervisors down to the store managers. Along these lines, compelling checking and control are accomplished through Walmart's various hierarchical functional organisational structure. Nonetheless, a drawback of this corporate structure is that it has very minimal flexibility for hierarchical adaptability because of lengthy communication and approval of middle and high levelled authorities at Walmart headquarters.

Analysis of the Ethical Issue

This part of the report does the analysis on how the company respond to the ethical issue and some recommendation on how they can have few strategies so that it can be avoided in the future. Before the incident occurred, Wal-Mart has intended to expand its business in Pineda's field of Mexico and determined that it will probably get in excess of 250 clients inside an hour because of the perfect area (Worsall, 2012). Wal-Mart has been told that, the business advancement has been denied. All things considered, Wal-Mart has destined by this choice and attempted to discover the ways, how the organization can construct a store in the Pineda's field. Meanwhile, the Wal-Mart authorities have built up a basic answer for support their expectation to assemble a store in the Mrs. Pineda's field. Wal-Mart authorities realized that, the arrangement has not been distributed in the newspaper and it won't be a law except if it distributed in the paper. Subsequently, it orchestrated to bribe an authority to permit the Wal-Mart store in the zone, in like manner will change the guide just before the conveyance to the paper.

The mystery map has been unpublished, and the Wal-Mart has effectively launched the store on the event of Christmas 2004. This violated the Foreign Corrupt Practice Acct 1977, which states that the companies are not allowed to make any bribe campaign to foreign officers, which then will automatically violate the law. However, Company is now running more than 2100 stores in Mexico and company accomplished its goal through the arrangement and execution of verbal correspondence with the government authorities. Regardless of its exploitative and unlawful activities, the Wal-Mart is as yet endeavouring to expand the organization's benefit through the advancement of the new techniques like dealing with the critics.

Now, let’s analyse how the company can accomplish or regain its status and what action could have been done or needs to be done to avoid similar scandal in future. A decent spot to begin for precaution and investigator measures would be for the organization to execute a successful corporate administration, which alludes to the instruments, procedures and relations by which enterprises are controlled and coordinated, controls. Beginning with the top, it is significant for the CEO to lead from the top to the base, building up powerful frameworks to help in the anticipation, recognition, and reacting to all revealed wrongdoing. Lee Scott, who at the time was the CEO, did not have any emergency the executives. Rather, he left the individuals who could give proficient skill out, he didn't answer to the board or law authorization, and rather he stifled the issue and secured it. Besides, when the report was sent to the United States, it could have been sent to right authorities at that point. Rather, it was sent back to Mexico, where the general insight had the option to manufacture a false report that was given no consideration after it was discharged. General Counsel in the two locales hid the issue away from plain view. Ultimately, the requirement for a whistleblowing program is obligatory. Working in a domain where quietness is a righteousness is insufficient. The absence of a hotline or whistleblowing program lead the plan on for quite a long time on the grounds that the claims were never answered to an autonomous source. The claims went from an informant, to the United States worldwide authority, and back to Mexico. When the United States adapted a portion of the subtleties including the charges, they secured and concealed it from the directorate. Setting up a code of morals would be helpful also. Morals assumes a job in our regular day to day activities. In the event that upper administration is settling on dishonest choices, at that point they are giving the alright for others to do same. Individuals are affected by awful conduct.

Conclusion

Wal-Mart was sufficiently careful to determine the discussion. As an outcome of this part, the association has begun the anti- corruption campaign in all over its store wherein the company operates. The message has been delivered to the intended interest group. By this powerful marking strategies and solid and proficient correspondence capacity with its few partners (predominantly with outside partners), Walmart has effectively figured out how to get over its bribery controversy which could adversely impacts the general organization.

References

1. Barstow, D. (2012). “Vast Mexico Bribery Case Hushed Up by Wal-Mart After Top-Level Struggle”, < http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/22/business/at-wal-mart-in-mexico-a- bribe-inquiry-silenced.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0/>
2. Barstow, D. (2012). “The Bribery Aisle: How Wal-Mart Got Its Way in Mexico”.http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/18/business/walmart-bribes- teotihuacan.html?pagewanted=all/>
3. Brouthers, L. E., Werner, S., & Matulich, E. (2012). The influence of triad nations' envi- ronments on price–quality product strategies and MNC performance. Journal of International Business Studies,vol- 31(1), pp-39–62. Country Comparison - Hofstede Insights 2019, Hofstede Insights. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/mexico,the-usa/
4. LeVine, S. (2012). Why Corporate America Shrugged at the Wal-Mart Bribery Scandal. New York and Washington D.C.: New America Foundation. MarketLine 2019, COMPANY PROFILE Walmart Inc, MarketLine. viewed 13 May 2019, https://advantage-marketline- com.ezproxy.lib.uts.edu.au/Product?ptype=Companies&pid=8046847E-B325-4AF0-BC79- 48100850E764/
5. MarketLine 2019, Country Profile Series United States In-depth PESTLE insights, MarketLine. viewed 12 May 2019, https://advantage-marketline- com.ezproxy.lib.uts.edu.au/Product?ptype=Countries&pid=ML00002-032/
6. MarketLine 2019, Mexico In-depth PESTLE insights, MarketLine. viewed 11 May 2019, https://advantage-marketline- com.ezproxy.lib.uts.edu.au/Product?ptype=Countries&pid=ML00002-020/
7. Shayon, S. (2012). Mexico Bribery Scandal Challenges Walmart on Corporate Ethicshttp://www.brandchannel.com/home/post/Walmart-Mexico-Corporate-Citizenship-042312.aspx/
8. Worsall, T. (2012). “Wal-Mart and Corruption in Mexico: So What?”, Online Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/22/business/at-wal-mart-in-mexico-a-bribe-inquiry-silenced.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0/