exit-popup-close
Still can’t find what you need?

Order custom paper and save your time
for priority classes!

Order paper now

Analysis Of The Views Of Leo Tolstoy On Art

Download PDF

What is Art? How would one even begin to answer that question? We’ve been around for thousands and thousands of years, yet as a race, we still struggle with understanding and explaining these abstract ideas such as, art, or beauty, or form. It takes some people like, Leo Tolstoy, decades upon decades grappling with these ideas before he could finally write his treatise on “What is Art?” in 1896. Philosophers sometimes get close with their theories but most of the time they could be missing one crucial element, their theory could be too broad, or it could be too vague, it could not apply to one style or another of art.

Want to receive original paper on this topic?

Just send us a request “Write my paper”. It’s quick and easy!

To Tolstoy, the intention of art isn’t merely to provide beauty, or to provide pride, leisure, or leisure. Art is a means of verbal exchange, and is an important approach of expression of any revel in, or of any element of the human circumstance. Beauty can’t be described objectively, and therefore cannot be used as a criterion to define what is, or isn’t always, artwork. Artwork cannot be described as an interest which produces splendor. He criticizes the belief that art is simplest applicable to a particular elegance of society, pronouncing that this is a misconception that could cause obscurity and decadence in art. Tolstoy defines art as an expression of a sense or revel in in one of these manner that the target market to whom the art is directed can proportion that feeling or revel in.

Regarding the character and motive of art, describing how art can express ethical values. Tolstoy does not outline art in phrases of its ability to explicit form and beauty, however as an alternative defines artwork in phrases of its ability to speak ideas of morality. For Tolstoy, aesthetic values are defined with the aid of moral values. According to Tolstoy, artwork cannot be described as an activity which produces splendor. Beauty cannot be described objectively, and consequently can’t be used as a criterion to define what’s, or isn’t always, artwork. The goal of artwork is not simply to provide splendor, or to offer pride, leisure, or entertainment. Art is a method of communication, and is an important method of expression of any experience, or of any component of the human condition. Tolstoy defines art as an expression of a feeling or experience in one of these way that the target market to whom the art is directed can proportion that feeling or enjoy. Art does not belong to any particular magnificence of society. To restrict the situation, count of art to the reports of a specific magnificence of society is to deny that artwork may be important for all of society. Tolstoy criticizes the notion that art is simplest relevant to a specific class of society, announcing that that is a false impression which can cause obscurity and decadence in artwork.

According to Tolstoy, properly art is intelligible and comprehensible. Bad art is unintelligible and incomprehensible. The greater that artwork restricts itself to a particular audience, the extra difficult to understand and incomprehensible it will become to human beings out of doors that unique audience. Good art is not perplexing and incomprehensible to most people. To the opposite, top artwork can speak its meaning to most humans, as it expresses its that means in a way which can be understood by means of every person. Tolstoy believes that art is good if it’s far judged to be proper by the majority of human beings. Indeed, he claims that a first-rate paintings of artwork is only excellent if it can be understood with the aid of each person. He also argues that if it isn’t admitted that art have to be intelligible and understandable, then any unintelligible or incomprehensible expression of mind or emotions may be known as ‘art. ‘ If any incomprehensible form of personal expression can be called ‘art,’ then the definition of art steadily loses its that means, until it has no which means in any respect. ‘Good artwork’ has a shape and content which can be in solidarity with the thoughts and emotions which it evokes or represents. In assessment, ‘awful art’ lacks team spirit of form and content material with the ideas and feelings which it attempts to evoke or constitute. ‘Bad art’ is shallow, repetitious, crude, clumsy, contrived, melodramatic, pretentious, or banal.

According to Tolstoy, the maximum essential great of any work of artwork is its sincerity. Any proper work of art expresses unique mind and feelings. The ‘maximum’ feelings which artwork can also explicit are related to non-secular notion. Tolstoy claims that professionalism reasons a loss of sincerity inside the artist, and argues that if an artist have to earn a residing by way of generating art, then the art that is produced is much more likely to be fake and insincere. Tolstoy additionally claims that interpretation or grievance of art is irrelevant and useless, because any appropriate work of artwork is capable of express thoughts and emotions which can be sincerely understood by using maximum people. Tolstoy argues that any clarification of such mind and emotions is superfluous, due to the fact artwork in the long run communicates feelings and experiences in a way which can’t be expressed through any phrases. Tolstoy does not accept as true with that art can be taught, or that preparation inside the exercise of artwork can assist humans to speak their thoughts and emotions more in reality. He argues that to educate art is to break its spontaneity. To train artwork is to damage the uniqueness of the artist. Any try and educate artwork leads to and try to imitate different works of artwork.

Tolstoy’s idea of ‘well-known’ art affirms that artwork is applicable to all and sundry. Art is relevant to everything of the human situation. Therefore, artwork should goal to be ‘well-known. ‘ Art is ‘conventional’ if it expresses thoughts and emotions which can be skilled by each human being. According to Tolstoy, everybody can also revel in non-secular mind or emotions. Thus, art is ‘accepted’ if it expresses religious feelings. The religious belief, or perception, which may be expressed by means of art is that the properly-being of humanity depends on social concord and know-how. Art that is honestly ‘time-honored’ expresses the perception that humans should recognize each different, must try to recognize each different, and have to percentage a feeling of brotherhood and sisterhood with each different. Tolstoy’s view of art displays the very idiosyncratic and independent nature of his non-public interpretation of Christianity. While he tries to outline a ‘familiar’ art as an artwork of inclusion, his aesthetic principle is narrowly centered on his personal principle of morality, and thus defines an art of exclusion. He excludes many varieties of artwork from what he considers to be ‘usual’ art, due to the fact he believes that ‘regularly occurring’ art ought to agree to standards that are not strictly aesthetic, but moral and social. This aesthetic concept makes it vital to keep in mind the question of whether aesthetic values are the same as ethical and social values. Tolstoy excludes many styles of art from what he considers to be ‘right’ art, because he believes that ‘top’ art ought to speak some form of religious revel in. For example, he refers to the tune of Bach and Mozart, the comedies of Molière, the poetry of Goethe and Hugo, and the novels of Dickens and Dostoyevsky as examples of ‘correct’ artwork. However, he refers to the poetry of Baudelaire and Mallarmé, the plays of Ibsen, and the track of Wagner and Liszt as examples of ‘terrible’ artwork.

Tolstoy argues that true artwork need to be religious artwork. He assumes that spiritual art have to conform to his personal religious standpoint, and that his non-public form of Christianity is the simplest actual shape of Christianity. His deeply personal but very narrow viewpoint may be disputed, however, by means of the argument that exact art may not always be non-secular art. His argument that aesthetic values need to be ethical and religious values leads him to the false conclusion that the remaining aim of art must be described by using his very own ethical viewpoint.

10 December 2020

⚠️ Remember: This essay was written and uploaded by an average student. It does not reflect the quality of papers completed by our expert essay writers. To get a custom and plagiarism-free essay click here.

close
Sorry,
Your Email

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and  Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails.

close thanks-icon
Thanks!

Your essay sample has been sent.

Order now