Enlightened Abolitionism And Catherine Of Aragon
Leadership is a unique role in every form of government spanning time from the beginning of civilization to the present. As such, there have been several different attempts to renovate leadership roles to be more successful for the nation. From dictators to republics, countless nations have tried countless governmental systems to improve their rule. However, few leadership ideas had as much intellectual influence as the concept of enlightened abolitionism in the 18th century. Leaders such as Catherine attempted to follow the teachings of Enlightenment philosophers by focusing on human rights, religious toleration, and educational reforms.
Catherine of Aragon was naturally introduced to a group of lords and rulers and was bound to wind up noticeably one herself. She was pledged since she was around four years of age to the future ruler of England. She satisfied this fate, however moved toward becoming victim of Henry VIII's failure to deliver a male beneficiary. Hence, she was expelled from her honored position and her marriage canceled. Albeit, perhaps not the most noteworthy of Henry VIII's spouses, she unquestionably had left a mark on history.
Catherine was seen as a very intelligent woman. She made it her goal to reform Russia and this followed through with her thoughts and ideas on enlightenment. In Letter of the Baron de Breteuil he states that she is very ambitious. That she would encourage the sciences and arts and that they would flourish. However, he also goes along to state the negatives about her and how she is proud, and arrogant and that she will be stubborn and those who put too much trust in her should be distressed.
She shows her strength in humanity and shows how she cared for her people and only wanted the best for them by saying that “What is the true End of Monarchy? Not to deprive People of their natural Liberty; but to correct their Actions, in order to attain the supreme good…”. Sometimes it can be seen as her being self-centered with how she went about her superiority. She was charming, yet very prideful.
Catherine's goals and approaches were results of the eighteenth century; her demands to be enlightened were particular to Russia as that time. History specialists who have focused incredible exertion on examining how intently Catherine's words coordinated her activities, that she was so consistent with the Enlightenment. However, instead of analysis Catherine as a wolf in sheep's clothing and examining the hole between her words and activities from the point of view and standards of an alternate time, with various esteems and implications, it ought to be dissected that Catherine's expectations and arrangements and the requirements that she confronted. It is to be contends here that Catherine the Great was in fact recognized. She was a dynamic, vigorous, keen ruler, some of the time liberal, at times savage, constantly vain, constantly diligent, yet with unswerving sense of duty regarding modernizing Russia.
