Social Mobility is Crucial in Terms of Creating a Fairer Society

In view of social mobility has started showing as a serious issue and deteriorating since the 1980s owing to this has faced different kinds of barriers. As previous reports, people, mostly young people, encounter them at each stage of education, from early years through to Higher Education, then even into the labor market. These barriers are triggered by a combination of their SES (Socio-Economic Status), gender, and ethnicity.

Nowadays, the UK considers that social mobility is crucial in terms of creating a fairer society, fostering social cohesion, and maximizing society's productivity. In other words, higher levels of well-being in society are equal stronger social mobility. Therefore, it is important to know its definition, what is social mobility? The concept of social mobility is complex. Intergenerational mobility refers to the breaking of the relationship between an individual's parental history and their opportunities to achieve their full potential in terms of income and occupation. It can also focus on aspects such as educational attainment, occupation, or health. Intra-generational mobility, on the other hand, refers to how people's social or economic conditions fluctuate. In other words, social mobility is about better opportunities for each generation and making access to these opportunities fairer, regardless of background. This report considers that race, gender, and social-economic class are the key factors that build obstacles to social mobility in the UK, and they can all have a substantial effect at a certain given time in order to achieve upward net mobility. Finally, this essay will first look at the comparison of mobility rates between ethnic minorities and white British. Secondly, it will focus on gender gaps in mobility resources among people from lower-working class backgrounds than among the white British, and finally, it is going to conclude with some recommendations.

Just 38% of adult ethnic minorities who migrated to Britain were upwardly mobile, while 44% were downwardly mobile, resulting in net downward mobility, according to pooled BHPS and UKLHS 2009-2011'. They had to fight against to difficulties with the English language or their foreign qualifications. The 2nd generation, on the other hand, had earned all their education in Britain, which translates to being fluent in English and possessing British credentials. Despite some net upward mobility, 20% of 2nd generation minorities from lower working-class backgrounds remained substantially more susceptible to unemployment than their white British counterparts. To put it another way, the 2nd generation from these backgrounds had considerably better chances of upward mobility, but unemployment risks remain too high. As per detailed research focused on four major ethnic minority groups (Indian, Pakistani, or Bangladeshi, Black Caribbean, and Black African background), they have higher risks of unemployment (around one-quarter are unemployed) and lower chances of upward mobility into the salariat, except for people of Indian background who are the most effective, with the highest rate of upward mobility into the salariat (32%) and the lowest risk of unemployment (11%). They hold their own against the white British.

Furthermore, there have always been significant disparities in men's and women's mobility opportunities. This last gender category has a lower chance of achieving higher-level professional and managerial roles and is more likely to serve in lower-level professional and semi-professional positions. It shows minor gender gaps in the chances of reaching the salariat from lower-working-class backgrounds as a researched plot. In contrast, men are more likely than women to be unemployed, particularly black the Caribbean and black African men. To conclude, gender differences between minorities and the majority are generally similar. As a result, it is deduced that gender differences have less impact on net upward mobility in the United Kingdom than race and socioeconomic status.

To sum up, barriers are created by a variety of factors, the most prevalent of which are social-economic status, ethnicity, and gender. All these factors are equally significant and have the same severity in terms of preventing the decrease of social mobility. It turns out, they are all bound and related in some way due to their consequences. For example, we have a social-economic status that is largely determined by race; by this, I mean that many people are categorized according to which ethnic group they belong to, and therefore social class matters so much today. It is also worth mentioning that many racial groups are discriminated against based on their gender, which exacerbates the issue at hand. Finally, these three variables are intertwined, and each is dependent on the other. As a result, different obstacles must be overcome in order for social mobility to rise increasingly over time. Later on, if we focus on this major societal issue, we will be treated fairly and have higher employability, in general words, better opportunities for each generation and making access to these opportunities fairer, making sure that people of all backgrounds get equal opportunities in early years, at school, in universities, and in work, ensuring that a person's occupation and income are not tied to where they started in life.