A Research Essay On Common Sense, Attitudes, And Critical Reasoning

“Silence is not always a sign of wisdom, but babbling is ever a mark of folly.” Each person should know when to speak and stay silent. It is a mental thing to do to prepare your physical part to take the necessary action, just like having common sense. Common sense should come naturally to an individual in specific situations. It is an approach to do what’s necessary for a particular state. There are two of the most known types of common sense. There are common sense knowledge and common sense of ability. The main focus of this research paper will focus on common sense knowledge and ability, attitudes, and critical reasoning.

Common sense knowledge includes facts about events occurring in time, about the effects of actions by the knower and others, about physical objects and how they are perceived, and about their properties and their relations to one another. An example is the fact that eggs contain a yolk and a white and a shell, how to recognize an egg, the effects of hard-boiling them and the effects of dropping them. The core of common sense knowledge concerns actions and other events. Every human knows he can perform a variety of actions and that the chosen actions affect the future in characteristic ways. Common sense ability involves the use of common sense knowledge and the observation of the world to decide what to do to achieve one's goals. The 'common' in 'common sense' refers to the fact that a large amount of this knowledge and ability is common to all humans. Not much of it is understood correctly enough to include it in computer programs.

We may call the human ability to take facts into account common sense reasoning ability. In any given case, it may be difficult to ascertain whether an action rule is being invoked or whether reasoning with facts is being done. The distinction is not always clear. First, a system that reasons with facts may itself be built up from rules. Second, the information is available in redundant forms. Attitude performs a great part in how people interpret common sense. The classic warfare that science and faith keep it up could be a part of the universal conflict between those who are aware of living accommodations on the opposite sides of the boundary that separates sense from that of attitudes. Most people neither thrive on racial attitudes nor resolve their minds on the implications of their life in the world of common sense. Once these issues have been resolved, they are so reluctant their rightful “fan” can only look on each other as having no reason for existence whatsoever.

One of the conflicts is science. Not many people agree with or how it works or how scientists make it work. The importance of science is showing man what in detail the world is, giving him/her time and space to get in order so he/she can deal with situations of nature to his/her advantage. Religion itself is a mood as opposed to a collection of recommendations, yet all religions will, in general, harden into philosophy and subsequently close into science. The belief in and worship of superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods. Science and religion aren't so much opposed to disparate. They do, indeed, within the case of the individual, tend to crowd one another out; however, the important historical opposition isn't between two hostile entities, science, and faith, however between two teams of minds within which these tendencies became solely embodied. The conflict which we have been tracing is twofold; not only do the common-sense people oppose the attitudinal spirits,-and this is by far the more fundamental phase of the conflict; but the latter also wage war among themselves. Common sense is one; while attitudes, personalities, ideals of what life and the world ought to be, are many and diverse.

In no department of the human mind is this twofold conflict better illustrated than in philosophy. The character of any philosophy is decided by 2 factors, attitude, and technique, or insight and technique. With one category of philosophers, as we have seen, the angle consists of denying all attitudes; the insight is simply that there's no insight. With the bulk of philosophers, however, insights have competed an outsized and conspicuous half. This matter of insight is that the pou sto, the start line that determines the final direction that the philosophy goes to take; whereas the technique, on the opposite hand, lies within the linking of the varied steps of reflection, in accordance, for the foremost half, with the thus given direction. The technique, method, logical equipment, is uneffective of itself to provide a philosophy; there should be one thing to relinquish direction, emphasis, selection, impulse, and life.

Critical reasoning involves the ability to actively and skillfully conceptualize, analyze, question and evaluate ideas and beliefs. Critical reasoning is the opposite of dogma. The critical reason, particularly the metaphysical whole of it, typically runs counter to naive reason, otherwise called good judgment. Whereas this can be no justification for rejecting the philosophical conclusion out of hand and completely, it's nonetheless a challenge to canvass its grounds. Good judgment has triumphed over some previous scraps of philosophy, and it's rather doubtless to conquer those that don't seem to be so previous. It's time to sound a note of warning to philosophers to not be too reckless in flouting good judgment. Common sense involves certain abilities to decide what to do to achieve goals. These abilities are common to all non-feeble-minded humans; indeed many very retarded people possess common sense abilities so far lacking in any computer program. Many of these abilities seem to transcend specific domains of application.

Common sense has no eccentricities, nor specialties, nor oddities. It doesn't try the winged flights of genius. It doesn't use the lead and line that fathom mysteries and live the profound issues. It doesn't use the glass of speculation and discovery. It's a humbler workplace - an additional convenient and helpful one. It's a home sense. Its service is in normal things - in everyday affairs. It's equal, averaged sense, beneficently distributed, for the convenience of man. God has kindly given en-us this facile endowment or light-armed instrumentation, to fulfill emergencies, and work in America for responsibilities, like don't enable time for calculation, or the slow method of investigation.

Common sense knowledge and ability, attitudes, and critical reasoning all help shape up common sense in a person. Though they are all different, they still contribute very much to what’s happening when an individual has to make a quick decision about a situation. “Let neither be the subject of mirth or sport. Laugh as soon at the maimed, or the cripple. Let those who are well endowed, be thankful, and seek to make wise use of their gifts ; for to whom much is given, of them will much be required.” This quote is encouraging us to be normal. As human beings, not all the decision we will make will be right, some will be wrong and we just have to learn from them.