Analysis of the Article About Canada and US Food Security
The objective of this paper is to look critically on how the article brings out an understanding. The writer of this article, Karen Burson, has a wide thinking about the relationship between the US and Canada. Ideally, she considers her thinking according to how the Canada-US border could shut down. This border is what enables food distribution in a cost-saving way. Furthermore, the article showcases how the border might shutdown due to outbreaks such as major diseases like bird flu or even a terrorist threat. The writer tries to give light of the possible outcome in food availability upon the ties with the US being broken. According to the writer, the use of trucks as a means of food transport through the US can lead to the US president, Donald Trump wanting to get into the trade or protest. However, this argument is not well supported with enough facts. Additionally, she states that, as much as Canadians are the world’s chief suppliers of wheat and different commodities, most of the products used, are imported more than exported to other countries.
The Ontario’s Local Food Act is an important legislation that could lead to healthy food access. Most importantly, it is a way of ensuring that local farmers are income-adequate and well supported. In addition to that, the food export is also supported. The data presented shows how much the writer has researched and come up with a valid finding. This could be a good solution in case the ties with the US breaks. Also, the source of the evidence is trustworthy as the writer uses an act to prove her point. Additionally, the writer uses the Ontario Greenbelt map to show the agricultural land for food growth. She argues that the countryside isn’t the only place where food consumed locally should be planted. She adds that now people are enlightened that also urban centers through urban-agriculture is another way of strengthening the food supply. However, the writer criticizes America by trying to reveal how they have not been using their potential as Canadians by just depending on the US. She doesn’t give an evidence to support her claims but it sounds reasonable according to how she entails about Canadians strengthening their own food supply.
The aspect of food security in Canada is well entailed in the article. Ideally, the article is written to address all Canadians. It intends to give them a challenge in such a way that they become dependable. The writer insists that they shouldn’t be depending on the US each and every moment. At some point, the kind of reasoning in the article is logic. This is because the writer includes evidences of what she states. Furthermore, she even uses quoted words to insist on her points. However, she also uses some claims which are irrelevant. For example, she mentions about the US president, Donald Trump and how he acts in rather selfish ways by creating walls. She tries to disapprove America in every way while she forget s that America has made tremendous progresses on its own.
In conclusion, it is plausible to say that the article is average. This is possibly because it doesn’t bring out the major points clearly but rather includes minor claims which could be avoided. In as much as the article is quality, its weaknesses cannot be ignored. However it has some strengths which I cannot leave out. This includes on how the writer has maintained the points while focusing on the title all through. In addition, she portrays a sense of in-depth findings by providing valid evidences. She even uses a picture to lead her point home. I am convinced by the writer since she has explained how we need to depend on ourselves. Therefore, I have no objection that her claims are real.
