Effect of Theoretical Physics: Re-perception of Space & Time, the Creation of Quantum Mechanics

Abstract

This research paper presents the advances in theoretical physics and its impact on people from a historical perspective. Theoretical physics is a part of physics that uses mathematics and physical knowledge to solve problems in Newton's classical mechanics. The paper will use the timeline to cite several breakthroughs in theoretical physics to describe its process and use the impacts of these breakthroughs on specific areas to introduce the importance of theoretical physics progress. Therefore, these contents are contained in three aspects: past, present, and future. In the course of the study, this paper concludes by studying the topics “A Brief History of Time”, “The Universe in the Nutshell”, and “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies”, as well as by consulting the data that supports believes that re-perception, creation of quantum mechanics and prediction of future could reflect the research results. Thus, the advancement of theoretical physics has helped physicists solve the problems that have confused them for centuries, and has had a significant role in the breakthrough of human technology.

The exploration of the universe is endless, and the duty of physics is to understand human origins by understanding the universe. Over the course of decades of science, great scientists have worked hard to advance physics and gain a better understanding of human existence. However, what tools do physicists use to carry out this magnificent project? Throughout history, ancient thinkers, in order to study the existence of the universe, created a series of guesses and perspectives, which were combined to form philosophy. After hundreds of years of development, philosophy slowly appeared too general and people needed a more detailed description of phenomena. As a result, physics has emerged to fill this gap.

This article will use three controlling ideas to prove the viewpoint. These ideas are re-perception of space and time, the creation of quantum mechanics and the effect of theoretical physics on people’s lives in the future.

The Re-perception of Space and Time

Ancient philosophers proposed many similar 'geocentric' theories through guesswork and subjective thinking to describe the universe, which then slowly became a classical universe based on Newtonian mechanics. In some aspects, however, it is still incomplete. Thus, the re-perception of space and time provides another solution about the universe's structure, which is established by the creation of relativity and the theory about the stable speed of light.

First and foremost, the discovery of the principle of constant light speed is a great advancement of theoretical physics. To be more specific, in the 1760s, an apple hit the head of Newton, which let him begin thinking on gravity, and led to the creation of Newton’s theory of gravity. Based on his classical mechanics, scientists began to revive the Ether theory abandoned in the 18th century, arguing that there was an 'ether'(an imaginary and stable medium in the universe) in the universe as a medium of transmission of light and claimed that “time” was a constant amount full of space which measures every process. According to this hypothesis, the speed of light is affected by relative motion, and its velocity changes relative to the reference system. However, theoretical physics began to be inconsistent with the actual phenomenon of the universe, since light shows the same when scientists were measuring in different places. This was a huge blow to theoretical physics until Einstein's special theory of relativity explained this phenomenon: the speed of light in a vacuum was always constant, regardless of the state of motion of the reference system used by the observer. After the Michelson-Morley experiment was finished by physicists Michelson and Morley, this hypothesis was certified greatly. Therefore, physicists began denying the original hypothetical theoretical system of the universe, and the principle of constant light speed has become a milestone in the cognitive universe.

Secondly, the creation of relativity by Einstein provided another explanation of the structure of the universe. When Einstein thought about the new theoretical system of the structure of the universe, he thought that people being hit on the head by an apple could be equivalent to people and the ground rising together to touch the apple. At the same time, this equation may explain why the person standing on the ground feels the same as when he is in an accelerated container. Einstein had a premonition that acceleration was closely related to gravity, space might not be as flat as the Newtonian universe but is curved, and the equation above will be proven. In this way, relativity was born.

Re-perception of space and time is an indispensable breakthrough in theoretical physics, and it is also a manifestation of people jumping out of existing knowledge systems and thinking about problems in new ways.

It is an interesting process to study the changing attitudes of people towards science. On the last day of the nineteenth century, when the famous physicist Kelvin was talking to other physicists, he had never forecasted that the black-body model and the theory of the speed of light, would have destroyed the original complete physics building, and created the greatest achievement in the history of physics today. At that time, the black-body model and the theory of the speed of light seemed to be just 'two dark clouds' over physics. In fact, the theory of light velocity leads to relativity, and the black-body model results in quantum mechanics. According to the process of quantum mechanics’ advancement, there are two representative examples: the explanation of the photoelectric effect and the uncertainty principle.

First and foremost, the photoelectric effect is a phenomenon found by German physicist Hertz in 1887. The phenomenon has troubled physicists for years, but the explanation of it also promotes theoretical physics. To be more specific, the black body is an ideal model, as it absorbs and radiates electromagnetic waves, but does not reflect them. By studying the radiation of the black body, physicists Rayleigh and Jeans established the Rayleigh-Jeans formula through classic theories of physics to explain what they found. However, they discovered that some of the phenomena were not suitable for outcomes. How to solve this question? This confused people for many years until physicist Planck made a hypothesis: the energy carried by the vibrating charged particles is not continuous. He created the black-body radiation law to explain it (E=hv). In his formula, “h” represents the Planck constant, which is the first description of quantum. Although this formula interprets blackbody's radiation perfectly, Planck still doubted his formula. After that, physicist Einstein used the black-body radiation law to expound on the photoelectric effect, which affected the discovery of light’s wave-particle duality greatly. Thanks to this explanation, Einstein was nominated for a Nobel prize in physics. In this long process, the interpretation of the photoelectric effect contains the achievements of many physicists, which promotes the development of quantum mechanics.

Secondly, the uncertainty principle is also one representative instance. While Einstein was exploring the theory of relativity, the work of Austrian physicist Schrödinger and German physicist Heisenberg left him helpless. The famous thought experiment “Erwin Schrödinger's Cat” and the uncertainty principle confused Einstein, and he made a famous statement against them: 'God does not play dice with the universe'. Why did Einstein disagree with quantum mechanics? According to the uncertainty principle, people cannot determine the position of a particle and its velocity at the same time. Therefore, the randomness of quantum mechanics is too absurd to accept. Nevertheless, the acceptance of this particular theory represents a major advance in theoretical physics, suggesting that physicists have become tolerant and receptive to the standards of the laws of physics. Thanks to this tolerance, new theoretical physics allows physicists to explore nature that is not limited to classical physics.

The photoelectric effect and uncertainty principle are just two representative examples of theoretical physics. Indeed, there are many important theories here to illustrate phenomena of the universe and interactions in quantum mechanics, and they come together to lead the breakthrough of theoretical physics.

The Effect of Theoretical Physics on People’s Lives in The Future

The study of black body radiation and light led to two of the greatest theoretical physics theories of modern time: quantum mechanics and general relativity. In the long-term development, physicists used general relativity to re-explore the macrocosm and used quantum mechanics to study the microscopic world to promote the great progress of physics. Nowadays, machines invented by quantum mechanics have benefited humans in real life, such as lasers, electron microscopes, and nuclear magnetic resonance technologies. However, scientists and physicists still ask themselves: can theoretical physics help humans in other aspects? In fact, there are two ways that have been able to influence people’s lives: predicting the future and space-time travel.

First and foremost, predicting the future is one goal to be achieved. Before Einstein created the theory of relativity, and Hertz had discovered the photoelectric effect, French physicist Laplace had come up with a scientific hypothesis in 1814: 'There is a creature that knows the exact position and momentum of each atom in the universe and can use Newton's law to show the whole process, past, and future of cosmic events.' This hypothesis called Démon de Laplace was the first time a physicist had made a hypothesis about satisfying the conditions for predicting the future. Nevertheless, modern interpretations of quantum mechanics have led physicists to question the reason behind the Démon de Laplace. After Heisenberg finished the uncertainty principle in 1927, physicists all considered that people cannot measure the speed and position of specific particles at the same time. Does this mean that Laplace's assumption is unachievable? Today's physics does not have the capacity to achieve Démon de Laplace’s level, but it is able to reach half of Laplace’s theory. This solution is called the wave function. The wave function is used to describe the state of microscopic systems in quantum mechanics. It means although physicists cannot measure particle's conditions of speed and position together, they can use the function to vaguely describe these two quantities. This gives physicists hope that perhaps in the future, physics will be able to achieve the approximate state of the ' Démon de Laplace ', then vaguely predict the micro-state, the macro-world, and finally have the capacity to predict the approximate future.

Secondly, under general relativity, physicists begin to think whether space-time travel is possible in the large-scale universe, or in other words, does general relativity allow space-time to be curved to a point that let macro-space-time shuttles be achieved? To be more specific, after Einstein proposed the theory of relativity, time changed from an absolute amount to a relative. Gravity can bend space and affect time together. This suggests that everyone's time is different, allowing the emergence of fictional movies scenes: the subjective time of pilots passing through the space-time tunnel is only a few months away, but the Earth's time has passed for years. However, this is all based on speed. In theory, Hawking argues, passengers on planes will have fewer lives as they continue to travel in the opposite direction of the Earth's rotation, which will increase oppositely. Why people do not feel that? Because in one way, they do not have 'continue flying,' and in another way, this effect is too small that even less than 'the benefit that does not eat junk food in planes.' Not only limited by speed, but they also have another theory against the time-space travel hypothesis: Time Paradox.

Although this theory was first proposed in the novel, people should not ignore it. According to this novel, this paradox points out one possible situation: if a traveler shuttles back through time and space and kills his grandfather, will he still exist? Or more difficult, will he get caught up in this circle of time and never escape? Even though American physicist Everett offers an explanation called parallel universes, will the parallel world that the traveler shuttles back to and his own world be affected by his actions? Obviously, people do not have the experience of space travel and never encounter any people from the future asking for stones (In the Avengers 4, in order to save another world in parallel universes, Captain America once again shuttled through time and space, returned the infinity stones in the older past, thus avoided everything from the start). However, some scientists suggest that whether people can achieve time-space travel by following the boundaries of the universe, just like around Earth. This is an interesting hypothesis, but it does not fit the theories. According to modern physics, physicists argue that humans still cannot figure out where is the center of the universe, so they are not able to determine the boundaries of the universe. Moreover, Einstein's theory of relativity predicts the fact that the universe is expanding, so that people can never orbit the universe with the help of light-speed spacecraft. On the other side, if this voyage is completed, the human will be destroyed by the blue shift of the universe (the sign of the contraction of the universe). Is that mean people will never achieve the goal of time-space travel? In fact, space-time shuttles in the microworld are common, people might find a way to decrease their macro size, same as the ant man in Marvel movies.

Although theoretical physics is similar to philosophy or even metaphysics in some respects, it conforms to positivism because it has a framework that is proved by reality. Predicting the future and space-time travel are two goals of theoretical physics. Although they are hard to achieve, they provide the hope to physicists to analyze this exciting world.

Conclusion

The development of theoretical physics is a long and grueling process. Re-perception of space and time overturned deep-rooted ideas, redesigned the classical universe in a way that is different from Newtonian mechanics, and triggered an unprecedented scientific revolution. Moreover, the creation of quantum mechanics provides a valuable opportunity for scientists to analyze the interesting phenomena of the microworld and allows people not to confine themselves to the movement of macro objects. The effect of theoretical physics on people's lives in the future shows that the potential of theoretical physics is unpredictable. It not only gives people the chance to imagine the future but also has the capacity to achieve it.

However, the progress of theoretical physics is not only that, and should not only stop there. The future of physics is still unpredictable. It is difficult to create a theory because if scientists find a fact that does not match, it will be false. Therefore, all theories apply only 'temporarily' to the world until no inconsistencies are found, and this process of proof is endless. Nevertheless, theoretical physics is important to everyone, since everyone is affected by it. Whether people are scientists or not, he or she has the ability and responsibility to advance physics. After all, all mankind is responsible for their evolution and future.

References

1. Adkins, C. J., & Adkins, C. J. (1983). Equilibrium thermodynamics: Cambridge University Press.
2. Einstein, A. J. A. d. P. (1905). On the electrodynamics of moving bodies. 17(891), 50.
3. http://chiuphysics.cgu.edu.tw/yunju/cguweb/PhyChiu/H305Relativity/EinsteinSpecialRelativity.pdf
4. Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2013). Fundamentals of physics: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Hawking, S., & Hawking, S. W. (2001). The universe in a nutshell: Odile Jacob.
6. Hawking, S., & Jackson, M. (1993). A brief history of time: Dove Audio Beverly Hills.
7. Hobson, A. J. A. J. o. P. (2013). There are no particles, there are only fields. 81(3), 211-223.
8. https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1119/1.4789885
9. Kawasaki, T., Komoda, Y., Tokunaga, Y., Okada, Y., Shinomiya, H., & Hayami, T. (2006). Voice control system for operating home electrical appliances. In: Google Patents.
10. https://books.google.com/books?hl=zhCN&lr=&id=mI0TxowaDVsC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=A+History+of+Astronomy+from+Thales+to+Kepler&ots=lPg_cQfZab&sig=PqlzEZkEeymKe1QiI7HhR2114#v=onepage&q=A%20History%20of%20Astronomy%20from%20Thales%20to%20Kepler&f=false
11. Kumar, M. (2011). Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the Great Debate about the Nature of Reality, reprint ed. In: WW Norton & Company.
12. https://books.google.com/books?hl=zhCN&lr=&id=XSIssqPhDbEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=Quantum:+Einstein,+Bohr,+and+the+Great+Debate+about+the+Nature+of+Reality+Reprint+edition.+W.+W.+Norton+%26+Company.+2011&ots=4pDJS6Qbcw&sig=HY3glsV6RkQLPruh8W3lKbvZjHg#v=onepage&q&f=false
13. Laplace, P. S. (1820). Théorie analytique des probabilités: Courcier.
14. Lewis, D. J. A. P. Q. (1976). The paradoxes of time travel. 13(2), 145-152.
15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20009616?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
16. McCaughan, J. B. J. P. E. (1980). Jeans' role in the law of black-body radiation. 15(4), 255.
17. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9120/15/4/318/pdf
18. Michelson, A. A., & Morley, E. W. J. S. M., vol. 6, pp. 306-310. (1887). On the Relative Motion of the Earth and of the Luminiferous Ether. 6, 306-310.
19. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1887SidM....6..306M
20. Robertson, H. P. J. P. R. (1929). The uncertainty principle. 34(1), 163.
21. https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.34.163
22. 爱因斯坦. (1992). 爱因斯坦语录: 智慧大学.
23. 曾谨言. (2003). 量子力学教程: 科学出版社.