International Political Economy And International Trade

Abstract

The International Political Economy (IPE) study is an area of rapidly developed social science that attempts to understand international and global issues using the collective internal disposition head of analytical tools and ideological approaches. IPE is the field that is very good on the process that Joseph Schumpeter has called "Creative Destruction" (Schumpeter). IPE's growing impression as a study field is the result of continuous disadvantages of organizational boundaries between economics and politics and generally social sciences. The growing, most upset and interesting issues are that the most ideological, interconnected, or transit approaches can be considered best. If there is an "IPE project", the purpose of this objective is to reduce the fencing that will limit intellectual inquiry into social sciences so that it should be examined without significant questions and problems.

Borders

IPE is a proposal studying, or related issues. The traditional IPE Probability of International Trade, International Financial, Northern-South Relations, Multi-Purpose Corp. and the political economy of harmony involves analysis. This propaganda has been widespread in recent years because many universities have tried to establish a new IPE that is less centered on international politics and is less focused on the problems of the country's state and economic policy. These scholars seek to find new disciplines of IPE, which will move international politics and international economies into study and research fields.International

Economics and International Politics

Without the international political economy, it is difficult to imagine a world as widely appreciated today with international politics (or international relations), the international economy and many ideological research and policy analysis applied is the subject of the political measures of the country's countries clearly affect international trade and financial flows, which Affect the resulting environment where countries must have policy options and economic options for companies. Does it seem impossible to think of international politics or major international economic issues without reciprocal effects and effects?However, experts and policymakers often think of international economies that do not pay much attention to international politics and vice versa. Economists often recognize the interests of the government while political scientists sometimes fail to see the state, and both reject dynamic dialogue between the state and the market specializing in political economy. In some cases, a wall has been established between the international economy and international politics

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPE) and the Arab Oil Director from 1973 to 1974 described the minimum IP dimensions at least IPE.First of all, the economic resources and the impact of foreign resources in foreign policy have shown. After OPEC, no country can dare to political policy without accounting for foreign exchange or reaction.Second, it seems that the oil embargo that the West East and West has not always been the most important concerns of the state - cannot ignore the political and economic problems between the North and South anymore or the cold deal as a gift for the strategy of war is not to the extent that economic matters close to the surface in North - It reinforced the notion that politics was, in fact, a political economy.Thirdly, the oil owners have a complex interrelationship between domestic politics, local economy, international politics and the international economy.Oil pollution questioned the fourth world economy, the role of multinational companies in politics. Many universities have already looked at many universities because of the factors influencing their home countries (and this was particularly true of US-based multinationals), but their political loyalty was much more pronounced. Were their instruments from multinational corporations funded by local governments, their host government agents, or were they acting as independent actors at home or in host political relations?Finally, the shift to international payments suggests that the oil embargo has encouraged the global financial system to move, yet globalization has generally been economic.

Growth and economic and political issues will be seen outside global control, not just international, individual states.Particular value during the Cold War. Two prominent deniers of this mighty ruler came out of the exception: economist Charles B.Kenneth N Waltz tried to move the economy into politics, in man, in the state, in politics.International politics and the international economy hidden in mutual instability have made dramatic international events in decades, as agreed between the two fields (Waltz). A mistake is often described in the negative system of oil workers and British Woods in the 1970s as major events in IPE development. These events face practical and ideological issues that have made scientists and policymakers necessary with the economy and politics.Simple divisions between state and market, domestic and international, politics and economy are not able to solve problems. A fast-paced world has a complex needfor analysis, which provides IPE.The IPE Problématique.IPE is probably an ideal type of phrase, which is related to each other, a set of them. International and international issues that cannot be considered or considered simply international politics or the international economy are identified. These problems lie in an increase in the international political economy.

In the 1970s and 1980s, he was the main line of IPE development in the international relations community and was named "The Book of International Economic Relations" or "Political Politics" in this book and list of courses (Spero, 1977). Please contact me through my e-mail address so that I can send you pictures and tell you more about me, I would like you to learn more about me, to counterfeit fake education. Although IPE research has taken several trends in this period, Questions on the agenda: international trade, international finance, North-South relations, multinational companies, genealogy problem - holiday concern - globalization - this list was added soon.International TradePolitics and economics have fully dealt with international trade with different methods using different analytical frameworks. The problem is that countries have thought about geography and population, relatively stable factors that define this area, while markets are interpreted through exchange and more contacts coming and coming. the range. Market markets are dynamic, transparent and poor; at least they agreeThey are also globally at the borders of countries and with their few markets today.

Trade in the market

When it comes to buyers and sellers in different countries, it becomes the purpose of international trade and political examination.The political analysis of this topic differs mainly from the domestic economic activity of international trade (while there is little difference between economic principles). (Milner, 1999) The international exchange of goods, services or resources with another country raises many political issues of national importance, in particular the economic and military security issues of the country.Although it is easy to improve security concerns (exports are necessary because they increase the country's drug reserves and are imported to avoid hiring because they rely on dependence, reduce national reserves, and threaten local business and labor) is more complex for international trade. Exports produce jobs, but are exported and depend on their overall impact on national security

What about the conditions?

Technology exports, in which major military or economic applications weaken national security, do not strengthen them. The United Nations has often imposed export controls on economic and military grounds. The export of primary products can cause fear of economic structure on the opposite conditions of manufactured goods and technology. Although trade leads to an increase in additional reserves, import exports can lead to a ceiling and two major political problems, such as Japan, facing the United States. The goal can sometimes be seen as an aggressive policy in the country's advanced exports, which can respond to protect its shady security interests. Therefore, a country is interested in regulating the nature of its exports to other countries and monitoring its trade relations with other countries.International trade has always been the focus of IPE analysis and is most likely to be the same in the future. Because of the economic and political importance of international trade, not because of the fact that trade is a reflection of the most important market tension of a country in every age (Heakal, 2018). In the Cold War, for example, it was a tool for international trade, as well as building American crowds and East-West strategy. In the 1980s and 1990s, trade was a source of strengthening regional interests, through regional economic integration. With a strong creative economy of globalization and advanced information technology, trade in intellectual property rights has become a controversial IPE problem.

International trade will remain

The main trade issue remains the main focus of IPE.International FinanceInternational finance traditionally explains the international political economy, which presents a second set of problems. International financial institutions analyze IPE exchange rates, foreign exchange systems, international investment flows, especially portfolio capital and debt flows, and international and domestic political institutions and structures. Let us analyze. Three examples illustrate the problems that are based on them.The problem with global financial markets is that they will not be able to meet any global structure of state power. That is, there is no political authority to satisfy the market. In principle, the IMF can play this role, but in practice, the authority of this institution is limited to limiting the ability to drain state sovereignty.International finance is seen from international trade as less economic and less economic, but these three examples provide contradictory evidence. Political researchers can participate in this analysis because difficult difficulties and archaeological terms need to be mastered, but there is no breakage zone for IPE analysis (amosweb). As the financial dimensionsIPE's international financial institutions have developed significantly with the evolution of IPE.

Hegemony

Cold War principles in the Cold War were the most important part of IPE in the principle of international relations. As Charles B. Jalbrabber was developed soon, focusing on the ideology and behavior of a dominant state. The theory of isolationism is a great IPE theory of history. Paul Kennedy and others have been told that it was developed in the same theory as fatigue or lack of deficiency. This principle tells us that morality is self-limiting, defeating itself, and thus a temporary one. This argument is that when the HEMO is burdened with the regulation of international regulations and the supply of public goods, the free-riding countries are happy, expanding, and increasing the burden on the Himonium. For some time hejemone was unable to afford the design and values of this system. Either the public One crowded places internal interests on its own international obligations, or it is too weak to meet promises. Ends with the same, tells the stories, and messes up to another crowd.(Provisional) mandate to restore the order. The shortage in the United Kingdom in the 19th century (after the World War) is often described as an example of reducing the hedge deficit as the end of the Bretton Woods system (the American occupation mechanism as we have seen). Iron curtains are likely to fall in 1989During Central and Eastern Europe, Soviet sympathy will be seen as unsatisfactory.Strong state, to provide public services to the international system. These public goods are stable money and security (such as the freedom of the sea), and it is a trade system that can be shared by all which is, in fact, is the best widespread common action. The provision of these public goods is, of course, costly, but despite the crowds, these extraordinary expenditures are due only to their hegemony over the world order. If the world's order is expectedHedgehog is also necessary. In fact, this item of public utility may be the only strategy that may be to secure or strengthen the dominant position of crowds.

Multinational Corporations

Multicultural companies (MNCs) and TNEs are always focusing on IPE researchers and practitioners. Initially the essential element of the strategy of the Western Cold War was seen. The essence of conflict was oftenIt was: International companies in the United States and the West linked their governments through "Hidden Handshakes". Mother's governments have used their effects to create opportunities for their companies and open markets ("host countries"). In turn, companies work in the economic and sometimes political interests of the country. During the Cold War, multi corporation corporations were often seen as economic agents of their governments and foreign agents.With the end of the Cold War, the analysis of multi-election force behavior is rapidly spread out, which is far more than their role in the cold warfare of geopolitics (Grunberg, 1996).

Asian National Centers and the increasing globalization of production and finance, researched the role of investment in investment investment and multi-magnetic corporations in technology monitoring. Multi-Corp. corporations had a commercial strategy when host countries were not clear in the national interests when the pursuit of multi-government and government governments became increasingly objectionable. The difference between the host country and the host country has become less pronounced. All countries are now in the sense of host countries that all countries compete for the capital, technology and employees in the global market for multi-purpose investments.IPE-developed global commas channels challenge our understanding of both markets and countries and represents an advanced level of IPE research.GlobalizationAt present time, research agenda factors and forces are often directed in IPE by a number of collective universities. There is no connection with the globalization of the traditional relations of the international relations, based on the fact that some scientists are now thinking about IPM in IPE as a notable academic, not only international relations subdomain (Woods).Globalization production, Problematique's global expansion begins, and questions about the causes of the causes and the impact of the growing global market structure. These are questions, politics, business, culture, technology, environment, global displacement, gender relations and tourism are not limited to them.The state is in the heart of Globalization Probability. The principle of international relations, the development of the state at the center, but a series of events of many scientists discussed that the state, absolute or relative relative to others' weaknesses either.The power and the player said that the national state is very small to cope with the global issues, effectively dealing with local issues (SIMMONS, 2009). The state is in the "lost medium" of modern world / local architecture. Since our mainstream of the "modern" society, the central state, what is usually the case of the outbreak of IPE analysis?

The question of the state is the only factor of Globalization Problematique, so it will be enough to keep scientists working for years. But they are the first problems created by globalization. Some people claim that there is an example of the famous creative disaster of Globalization Chapters. This creates opportunities for new and new forms of social and social relations, but it eliminates what happened before.Globalization is a process that seems to violate simple definitions, cut obstacles to whether these obstacles isolate nation states, or cultures, or labor markets or national economies. Globalization These obstacles break similarly that the IPE seems to be defeated by obstacles between different educational fields. The educational system, which examines the results of creative disaster, for each of the modern society and innovative structural structures, by doing this, probably has managed itself to work on an IPE unexpected task.

Mercantilism

Mercantilism is a national economic policy that is designed to maximize the trade of a nation. Mercantilism was dominant in modernized parts of Europe from the 16th to 18th century before falling into decline, although some commentators argue that it is still practiced in the economies of industrializing countries in the form of economic interventionism. It promotes government regulation of a nation economy for the purpose of augmenting state power at the expense of rival national powers. Mercantilism includes a nation economic policy aimed at accumulating monetary reserves through a positive balance of trade, especially of finishing goods. Historically, such policies frequently led to war and also motivated colonial expansion. Adams smith wealth of nation is worth reading regarding IPE.Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty and equality. Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support civil rights, democracy secularism, gender and race equality. But in IPE liberal political economy had a huge relationship between mainstream international economics with its focus on markets and mainstream international relations with its emphasis on the state.in liberalist school of thought they gave the importance to individuals.

Marxism

Marxism is a political, social and economic philosophy derived from the work of the 19th century historians Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. It views human history as a struggle between social classes and asserts that capitalism is inherently exploitative. In capitalists (states) are exploiting the poor (states) and for safeguarding their interests are resorting to wars and imperialism. The popularity of this approach has been increasingly ever since 1917.IPE Theories within the Marxist Tradition:Imperialism Modern world systematic theory Dependency theory Intellectual hegemony

Works Cited:

1. www.amosweb.com/cgi-bin/awb_nav.pl?s=wpd&c=dsp&k=international+trade. Retrieved from www.amosweb.com: http://www.amosweb.com/cgi-bin/awb_nav.pl?s=wpd&c=dsp&k=international+trade
2. Grunberg, L. (1996). The IPE of Multinational Corporations. In L. Grunberg, Introduction to International Political Economy.
3. Heakal, R. (2018, 01 12). www.investopedia.com/insights/what-is-international-trade/. Retrieved from www.investopedia.com: https://www.investopedia.com/insights/what-is-international-trade/
4. Milner, H. V. (1999). THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE. 24.Schumpeter, J. (n.d.). www.investopedia.com/terms/c/creativedestruction.asp. Retrieved from www.investopedia.com: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/creativedestruction.asp
5. SIMMONS, B. (2009). Mobilizing for Human Rights, International Law in Domestic Politics. Mobilizing for Human Rights.
6. Spero, J. E. (1977). The politics of international economic relations. Cengage learning.Waltz, K. N. (n.d.). Structural Realism after the cold war. MIT Press Journals, 40-41.
7. Woods, N. (n.d.). International Political Economy in an Age of Globalization. 24