Pro Life and Pro Choice: Pros and Cons
The debate of Abortion laws in the United States has been a discussed topic since Roe v Wade and has recently caught fire in the wake of the abortion restrictions that have been set in Alabama. Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy and has two sides to the story; pro-choice and pro-life. Pro-choice is giving women a legal, safe, and accessible option to have an abortion. Pro-life is the belief that women can not have an abortion and if they do then it’s illegal.
In favor of the pro-choice argument, The New York Times editorial board, for instance, used the phrase “clusters of cells that have not yet developed into viable human beings,” in a discussion of rights being extended to a fetus in the womb, or what the pro-lifers call a prenatal child. Language like this ignores the fact that each of us as soon as existed as “clusters of cells that have no longer yet developed into plausible human beings.” It seeks to cover the fact that by using the time most surgical abortions take place, a prenatal toddler has electrical undertaking in the intelligence and a beating heart. Other words and phrases used in the discussion about abortion searching for to dim this fact as well: “tissue,” “part of the mother,” “parasite,” “potential life.” Even the word “fetus” is dehumanizing. Outside of an abortion context, an obstetrician-gynecologist doesn’t generally communicate to a mother about her fetus. She talks to her about her baby. Family and friends arrange child showers, not fetus showers. A mother-to-be has a baby bump, not a fetus bump. She is “with child,” not “with fetus.” It is not uncommon for major news outlets, such as the BBC, to use the phrase “unborn babies” when they record on new prenatal surgical techniques. As for the pro-life argument, he right to the choice of an abortion is necessary to making sure a woman can figure out for herself if, when and with whom to begin or grow a family. Pro-choicers by no means cease war to defend and make bigger this fundamental human right. The Supreme Court’s landmark 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade that affirmed abortion as a constitutional right; starting the battle for women’s equality and autonomy. Since then, pro-lifers have been pressured to protect it over and over again as anti-choice politicians and agencies center of attention is on undermining and chipping away at our rights until they can restrict legal abortion access completely. They’ve passed lots of laws to hinder a woman’s capability to gain access to abortion care. These legal guidelines take many forms, consisting of trying to outlaw abortion altogether, shutting down clinics, and dictating which scientific methods are available. Anti-choice extremists will stop at nothing. They have opened thousands of faux health-care “clinics” that lie to and deceive women to prevent them from thinking about abortion as an option. When the right to abortion is endangered, the crucial equality of girls is threatened. A woman can in no way be equal if she is denied the right to make decisions for herself and her family. Seven in ten Americans support the decision to ban abortion. Pro-Choice America will continue to fight to preserve abortion bans for all women, regardless of background or income. Pro-choicers will mobilize collectively to defeat assaults in the states and in Congress. Pro-choicers help pick candidates who will be champions for reproductive freedom. And they will proceed to educate, inform and rally the public to guard and expand the critical human rights of all human beings to make their own choices about their lives. Overall, both sides of the scale just want what they think is best for the child and would do anything necessary for the health of others and the baby.
I truly believe that the right to an abortion is a natural one. Women’s reproduction rights should be untouchable and a woman should have the choice of whether or not they get an abortion, no matter the circumstance. A man can never know or feel what it is like to carry a child or give birth, a man can never form a bond with the unborn fetus the way most mothers can; which is why I believe that abotions should be up to the women, and only the women. I personally happen to agree with all of the pro-choice side because I would rather a kid grow up in a healthy home knowing that they are loved and appreciated rather then growing up in a foster home thinking that they are worthless. Pro-lifers do make a lot of compelling arguments, but they are mostly morals; I agree with the pro-choicers because most women who give birth to an unwanted child, leads the child to a hard life in the foster care system. The biggest issue I have with the pro-life argument is that I don’t see the pro-lifers standing up to defend and protect the children after they are born. The corruption within foster care systems, child labor used for unsustainable companies that operate in the United States and around the world, and not to mention the recent imprisonment of men, women, and children in the camps that ICE put them in during the round up of undocumented immigrants in our nation. Pro-lifers do believe that they are doing what is right for the children, therefore I do not have any disapproval of them; I just happen to disagree with them.
