The Vulnerability Of The Internet Of Things And Hippa Rules In Terms Of Confidentiality
Critical within the idea of security is the concept of privacy when it comes to HIPPA rules. In consideration of this fact, there is clarity in the way that encryption needs to be done to account for the variation and diversity in data transmission and storage. The first reason to consider is making sure that devices that are stored within areas that are not secured have a fallback plan. Therefore, under the Safe Harbor HIPPA rules, there is conclusive identification of the process of “addressable encryption of data at rest and required encryption of data in transit” as prevention measures for any breach that may occur. In this way, there is strong protection in terms of confidentiality when storage in end of life equipment is potentially threatening on the confidentiality aspect since there is possibility of threat “for potential HIPAA violations from data breaches pertaining to confidential patient records.”
Secondly, by using the encryption, there is containment of the possible avenues and path in which breaches can have loopholes and in many ways a definitive way in which the human error can also be taken into account hence responsible protocol development. This acts in consideration of the fact that permanent content in many ways affects the recyclability of electronics. In understanding, this value the rules allow for the need for certification that protects the data from prying eyes hence privacy of patients’ information. At the same time, it contributes to the added protection on complete destruction through setting up controls that will help in eradication of any trace of data hence a definitive way in which deliberate jeopardy can be prevented. This means that there is consideration of both hard copies and soft copies that have been included in these rules making sure that there is no mistaken push through
Thirdly, the reason sallow for notification of the breach to be clearly addressed within time as the pathways are carefully monitored within the trail of message delivery. This is possible through the technological awareness of the device capability in both storage and end-user guide that the hospital should be aware of. Therefore, the safe harbor allows for preventive measures to be put in place by looking at the device specification to make sure that value encryption processing and encryption implementation are enabled. They become part of the additional layers for validation of standards of acceptability in data storage and transmission. As result, the rules allow for visibility in terms of the controls put in place in case there is any breach and in that way mainstreaming data protection as an element of security and privacy control of information hence confidentiality.
Lastly, another reason for Safe Harbor rules for database security is the provision of a guideline for the application of Privacy Rules under HIPPA. Hence with this in mind, there is the removal of key identifiers for any patient and with this in mind a critical consideration that the data can only be seen as statistics without a “face”. In accounting for this aspect, the rule allows for the protection of names, ages, gender, and geographical locations. As result, this is an indication of risk management by becoming the main reason for identification of vulnerabilities within the health system of a hospital. In that way, there is development of accountability measures in terms of evaluation and programming in line with security, privacy, and confidentiality control.
