Truth Social Movement Aroung The Twin Towers Attack

The truth is something that is supposed to be revered in our culture. But somehow it has become something that is skewed, twisted, diluted, and manipulated to the point that whatever it is that is being played out in the media arena, whether it be on the internet, social media, or televised news, it is believed whether it is true or not. So when something historical happens that hits our country at the core, we are expected to take it at face value. “You cannot secretly prepare a controlled demolition of the two World Trade Center buildings containing 50,000 workers, plus extensive security systems and guards, working round the clock, without anyone noticing anything unusual. Instead, we should accept at face value”. But that’s not the case, now is it?

Our morbid curiosity for the unexplainable is an insatiable appetite that is always left unsatisfied. To fulfill that hunger for the true, social movements have been founded to shed light on what may be considered a shadowy world of conspiracies. The social movement surrounding the truth about what happened on September 11, 2001, has the tenacity to shine a light bright enough that the truth may not have been what was told to the rest of the world. Founders of the 9/11 truth movement, Alex Jones and Michael Ruppert, are dedicated to exposing the truth about the reasons surrounding the attacks on the World Trade Center on that fateful day in September 2001, by examining the evidence contained within the destruction of the twin towers against what the was told to the American public and the rest of the world.

When it comes to any major catastrophe that has happened throughout the history of the United States, there has always been some sort of conspiracy theory to disprove what did or did not happen. On July 1, 2001, just over a month before the attacks on the World Trade Center happened, Alex Jones, co-founder of the 9/11 Truth Movement, broadcast a two and a half hour show (Infowars) on what he perceived as a history of false-flag attacks perpetrated by the United Staes government. There has always been skepticism on what actually happened, especially when political figures such as, President Abraham Lincoln who was shot by John Wilkes Booth, a member of the Knights of the Golden Circle, a group who wanted to annex a confederation of slave stated within the U.S., and the assassination of President John F. Kennedy by Lee Harvey Oswald, to the supposed terrorist attacks on September 1, 2001, are involved in tragic events and questionable legality that have marred the history of our country. Even our own government has been accused of being privy to, or even having played a part in some of our country’s national calamities. Now the best way to build any conspiracy theory that’s going to have a little bit of credibility or at least some plausibility is to work backward, basically progressive analysis.

Now what you do is find some evidence that doesn’t fit with the official story and you go about hypothesizing what can account for the evidence. This is the basic scientific method that is used for everything else from the social sciences to physics, and chemistry. We now take a look at those who looked at the evidence first and then regressively theorized from there. Now as far as twin towers go, the most popular theory that presupposes some foul play is the demolition theory. This simply states that there is no president of skyscrapers anywhere in history collapsing from fire, essentially these fires don't burn hot enough to compromise the structural integrity of the buildings themselves.

Of course, there are those who countered that it was the actual impact of the Boeing 747 that compromise the structure of the building. But there's still some circumstantial evidence that the structural integrity wasn’t compromised by the initial impact themselves, mainly because the building didn't fall for some time. The theory goes a little bit something like this. The buildings fell because they were rigged with explosives, they were rigged with explosives because either, a) the attacks were anticipated and known about, or b) they were actually planned and incited by elements within the U.S. government.

There are five factors that people fall back on when they want to advance that the buildings were demolished rather than just the structural integrity giving out and having collapsed. The first is radial symmetry, the towers came straight down and debris was blown symmetrically in every direction. Without a premeditated and calculated demolition, this type of collapse pattern would violate the second law of thermodynamics. Then there is the rapid descent, the towers came down just slightly slower than the rate of a freefall in a vacuum, in other words, rather than just coming down because the support from underneath was knocked out, there was a little bit of the pause as the building collapsed suggesting those floors were blown out one by one. The third factor is demolition waves, the towers were consumed by synchronizing rows of confluent explosions. There are those who analyze the footage and point to signs of lower floors having windows blown out of them before the building comes down. This, of course, is open to speculation for a number of reasons, and one is the pancake theory, that was the result of the above floors falling on lower floors. However, there are those who don't believe that’s plausible. The fourth factor would be demolition squibs. The towers exhibited high-velocity gas injections well below the descending rubble. Explosions on lower floors blew out everything holding up the above floors. “The controlled demolition theory remains the one great unifying dogma of 9/11 'truthers,' as they call themselves”.

This is the case of the windows blowing out, again that is also up to debate according to the pancake theory but it still seems more plausible to the conspiracy theorist that this is exactly what went down. There are still a lot of unanswered questions and thing that just don’t line up with the official narrative of what really happened that fateful day our country was attacked. Was this attack just a cover-up for the reason why we went into Iraq and Afghanistan, or is there a more ominous underlying narrative as to who, what, and why American lives had to be taken.