Pregnant Women Care in Dental Office

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide basic knowledge for dental students and dental practitioners regarding management of pregnant patients in clinical practice. A pregnant female require extensive care, medical monitoring and emotional assistance and it is strongly recommended that a thorough oral health assessment is to be carried out for pregnant females. It is also important for a dentist to understand and take measures according to patient’s condition such as alteration in the medication and deference of certain elective treatments that may coincide with the organogenesis phase of the fetus and it is recommended that the practitioner consults with the patient’s obstetrician.

Introduction

Human gestation is a period of dynamic physiologic changes designed to support the development fetus. Systems affected include the respiratory, gastrointestinal, circulatory, and musculoskeletal. These alterations influence the patient's general health and make her prone to develop complications unique to pregnancy. The changes that occur in a pregnant female are due to an increase in maternal and fetal requirements for the growth of the fetus and the preparation of the mother for delivery. Several systemic, as well as local physiologic changes in a pregnant woman occur at the time of pregnancy. A substantial rise in secretion of estrogen and progesterone is seen by up-to 10 and 30 folds respectively. Also about 45% of females have gestational diabetes because pregnant women are unable to produce sufficient amounts of insulin to overcome the antagonistic action of estrogen and progesterone. These hormonal changes affect most of the organ systems and oral cavity is not exempted from it. Within the oral cavity, bacterial flora changes with the change in hormone levels and these changes support the occurrence of pyogenic granulomas and disease process in periodontium.

A Pregnant woman requires various levels of dental support throughout this time and the dentists therefore must understand the requirement of the pregnant patient and improvise the treatment plan and should not perform those procedures which could require multiple dental radiographs and medications which could be harmful to the fetus unless it is an acute infection and cannot be deferred. To protect both the mother and unborn child, dental professional may need to incorporate maternal counseling, treatment modifications, or changes to their customary medication repertoire.

Changes to the oral cavity during pregnancy

Gingivitis and pregnancy associated hyperplasia are the common mucosal changes observed. Pyogenic granulomas and changes in the saliva have been reported and are related to the elevated levels of estrogen causing an increase in the permeability of blood capillaries. This increase leads to accumulation of inflammatory factors. Pregnancy actually aggravates pre-existing diseases rather than causing it. A characteristic lesion of periodontium that appears is pregnancy is epulis, a type of pyogenic granuloma which is characterized by a dark red, swollen and smooth gingiva which bleeds easily. Due to an increase in salivary estrogen levels, the proliferation and desquamation of the oral mucosal cells provide a suitable environment for bacterial growth which also predisposes the pregnant woman to dental caries.

It has been theorized that the endotoxins from periodontal inflammation are risk factors and cause a stimulation of the production of cytokines and prostaglandins (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α). Such pro-inflammatory mediators could cross the placenta barrier and may induce fetal toxicity that can result in preterm delivery and low-birth-weight. Chemical mediators of maternal periodontitis have also been reported as a strong risk factor of preterm low birth weight and improving periodontal health before or during pregnancy may prevent or reduce the occurrences of adverse pregnancy outcomes and therefore, reduce the maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality but such cause to effect is yet to be proven as no such relationship has been established between periodontal disease and preterm low birth weight.

Radiography and chair positioning

It is advisable that during the first trimester, oral health status is assessed and the patient is informed about the changes which they might encounter during the pregnancy. Guidance about the management of these changes should also be outlined, if they take place. Patients must be educated and the dental treatment if possible, should be restricted to prophylaxis and emergency treatment where possible. Dental radiography is considered safe during pregnancy if protective measures have been provided such as thyroid collar, Lead apron and use of high speed E films. No fetal abnormalities have been reported to x-ray radiation values of 5-10 cGy and a complete set of full mouth radiographs results in radiation exposure of value 8 × 10–4 cGy. The greatest risk to the fetus from teratogenicity and death is during the first 10 days after the conception. Spontaneous abortions have been reported in the literature during first trimester when dental treatment were received by the patient. Organogenesis is completed by the end of first trimester and the second trimester is reported to be the safest time to carry out minor elective dental treatment, but dental emergencies such as acute pain and infections should be addressed at any stage of pregnancy to avoid patient discomfort. Treatments that are time consuming and require any elective surgical intervention must be postponed until delivery has taken place.

Dental chair position should be controlled and monitored while working because when uterus expands it lies right over dorsal aorta and vena cava. There is a chance that these may get compressed when patient is in supine position leading to decreases in cardiac output, venous return and uteroplacental blood flow. An Aortrocaval compression leads to supine hypotensive syndrome which is clinically characterized by weakness, restlessness, sweating, pallor and tinnitus. Such condition is managed by having the patient turn on her left side and placing a pillow to elevate her right hip and buttock by about 15°. During the second month of the third trimester, strict precautions should be taken, procedures should be deferred where possible. The rest of the period of the third trimester is safe for elective dental procedures that do not require surgical intervention. Protocols for dental radiography are the same as for first trimester and peri-apical and bitewing radiographs can be taken with protection protocols.

Prescribing medications to pregnant patients

During pregnancy the serum plasma concentration is reduced, there is higher lipid solubility and low plasma half-life thus, the prescribed drugs are easily absorbed, distributed and cleared from the system as compared to a non-pregnant individual. These factors increases the transfer of drugs from mother to fetus via placenta which can culminate and cause potential miscarriage, low birth weight, neonatal toxicity and teratogenicity which intensifies the chances of morbidity and mortality of the unborn child. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has classified drugs on basis of risk to mother-fetus during pregnancy into various categories.

Antibiotics

When prescribing antibiotics to a gestational woman, amoxicillin and penicillin V are the safest and the most common drugs and are classified as class B. Tetracycline and Doxycycline are categorized in class D because of their side effects on teeth and bone development. Arthopathy and congenital cartilage defects are found in animals with use of Ciprofloxacin but there are not sufficient evidence among human studies thus categorized in class C.

Analgesics

Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) is a relative safer drug for pain management of a pregnant patient as compared to Aspirin and has no negative effects reported so far but prolong use of acetaminophen with narcotics have shown neonatal respiratory depression. There is a risk of livers toxicity with the use of acetaminophen in adults and dosage should not exceed more than 4gm/day. Most of the analgesics which are prescribed to normal adults are categorized as class C for pregnant patients however there use is not absolutely contraindicated as there are no studies reflecting that they affect fetus but use of Class C drugs should be of short duration. Ibuprofen has been associated with fetal ductus arteriosus and inhibition of labor in third trimester thus categorized as class D but for first and second trimester it is categorized as class B.

Local Anesthetics and Vasoconstrictors

Local anesthetic agents can be used during pregnancy. Lidocane 2%, Prilocane and Etidocane are classified by FDA as safe anesthetic agents but there use should be monitored and should not exceed maximum recommended dose. Mepivicane 3%, Procaine and Articane can be used with caution with the consent of obstetrician and should be avoided if any alternate is available. Epinephrine is a class C drug, theoretically if injected intravenously it might impede uteroplacental blood flow, which can be avoided by slowly injecting local anesthesia using aspirating needle and limiting to a minimum dose required.

Restorative considerations

American Dental Association (ADA), FDA and WHO have classified amalgam restorations to be safe for pregnant patients requiring cavity restorations even though the dental community is uncertain about the use of dental amalgam. It has mercury which is a metal alloy, consisting of 50% of organic mercury. Dental amalgam fillings release mercury vapors (a form of inorganic mercury) in the oral cavity especially during chewing. As a result, mercury could cross the placental barrier through blood circulation. However; no such evidence has been found or is yet to be reported that it is harmful during the pregnancy and many concerns can be effectively managed with the application of dental rubber dam during restorative procedures. Composite resins and glass ionomer cements can also be used for treatment however, it was reported that bisphenol-A, a component found in composite resins, causes endocrine disruptions in animals.

Procedures which require gingivectomy should be done with caution and could raise a concern for a dentist while treating the patient as it may lead to bacteremia. Studies do not provide sufficient evidence to support the concern but pregnant patients may be given prophylactic antibiotic coverage if there is risk of developing infective endocarditis. In a controlled clinical trial, 1806 women were randomized to receive scaling and root planning. Those patients who were assigned to get delayed periodontal treatment until after birth showed a worsening of their periodontal status over the course of pregnancy. However, no significant correlation could be established between groups who had birth complications in relation to periodontal infection and the treatment provided for the disease. Nevertheless periodontal therapy should be provided either antenatal or during a safe pregnancy period and should be restricted to supra gingival scaling and polishing where possible.

Conclusions

It is important that a Dentist-Obstetrician-Patient interface is well established while formulating a treatment plan for pregnant patients so that the chances of complications can be significantly reduced for a better outcome. It is necessary that health professionals collaborate to ensure that such patients receive thorough oral health assessment, intervention as well as oral health education. The dentist must gain basic understanding of the physiological changes and influences that may occur during pregnancy with the use of certain medications and dental radiography. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons may be consulted in case there is an emergency involving trauma and severe dental infections. Active treatment should be focused towards improving the maternal oral and general health while minimizing the fetal risk.

References

1. Tracy M, Dellinger H. Mark Livingston. Pregnancy: Physiological changes and considerations for dental patients. Dent Clin N Am. 2006; 50: 677-97.
2. Clark SL, Cotton DB, Lee W, Bishop C, Hill T, Southwick J. Central hemodynamic assessment of normal term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1439-42.
3. Mabie WC, Di Sessa TG, Crocker LG. A longitudinal study of cardiac output in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:849-56.
4. Turner M, Aziz SR. Management of the pregnant oral and maxillofacial surgery patient. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 60:1479-88.
5. Suresh L, Radfar L. Pregnancy and lactation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 97: 672- 82.
6. Soory M. Hormonal factors in periodontal disease. Dent Update. 2000; 27:380-83.
7. Laine MA. Effect of pregnancy on periodontal and dental health. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002;60:257-64.
8. Laskaris G. Color Atlas of Oral Diseases. Athens:Litsas; 1998. p. 502-504.
9. Kurien S, Kattimani VS, Sriram RR, Sriram SK, Rao VKP, Bhupathi A, Bodduru RR, Patil NN. Management of Pregnant Patient in Dentistry. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5:88- 97.
10. Jeffcoat MK, Geurs NC, Reddy MS, Cliver SP, Goldenberg RL, Hauth JC. Periodontal infection and preterm birth: Results of a prospective study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001; 132: 875-80. [PubMed]
11. Yeo BK, Lim LP, Paquette DW, Williams RC. Periodontal disease – the emergence of a risk for systemic conditions: Pre-term low birth weight. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2005; 34: 111-16.
12. Parihar AS, Katoch V, Rajguru SA, Rajpoot N, Singh P, Wakhle S. Periodontal Disease: A Possible Risk-Factor for Adverse Pregnancy Outcome,J Int Oral Health. 2015; 7:137-42.
13. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Recommendations on limits for exposure to ionizing radiation. Bethesda, Md. NCRP, 1987. NCRP report no. 91.
14. Katz VL. Prenatal care. In: Scott JR, Gibbs RS, Karlan BY, Haney AF, editors. Danforth’s obstetrics and gynecology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2003. p. 1-20.
15. Thornburg KL, Jacobson SL, Giraud GD, Morton MJ. Hemodynamic changes in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 2000; 24:11-4.
16. ADA Council of Scientific Affairs. An update on radiographic practices: information and recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001; 132: 234-38